Case for presidential veto of GE labeling bill

Dear President Obama:

We are writing to express our strong opposition to the bioengineered food labeling bill (S. 764) passed recently by Congress, and to urge your veto of the legislation when it reaches your desk.

As organizations representing thousands of organic farmers, businesses and consumers, we have long advocated for meaningful, transparent and easily accessible food labels regarding genetically engineered ingredients.

The bill passed by Congress falls far short of this goal and establishes many dangerous precedents that could undermine the USDA organic label and contribute to consumer confusion in the marketplace. The bill warrants your veto for the following reasons:

1) The bill intentionally makes it difficult for consumers to get information about genetically engineered ingredients in their food, and places a disproportionate burden on low-income and rural residents.

Specifically, the bill gives food companies the option of using an on-package label symbol, 1-800 number, or quick response (QR) code to let consumers know if the food item contains GE ingredients. The QR codes would require shoppers to use smartphones to scan every food item they are considering for purchase if they want information about the GE content in the food. For many low-income shoppers without access to smartphones, or rural shoppers without cell phone service or Wi-Fi in their grocery stores, this would block access to GE ingredient information in a very discriminatory manner.

2) The bill intentionally blurs the lines between GE ingredients and non-GE ingredients in a manner that will only lead to more consumer confusion in the marketplace.

The bill creates a novel definition referred to as “bioengineered” food, which according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), would exclude from labeling requirements most foods currently considered to be genetically engineered under the FDA definition and other commonly used science-based definitions of genetic engineering.

3) The bill preempts states like Vermont from requiring clear, transparent and accessible labeling in the market place, and replaces that existing standard with an ambiguous labeling standard that will deny consumers the right of access to clear information about what’s in their food, and how it was produced.

4) The bill even preempts States from requiring clear labeling of seeds to let farmers know what type of seeds they are planting, and fails to establish any federal standards for transparent seed labeling to replace the State laws.

Consistent with other provisions in the bill that start to blur the lines between GE and non-GE foods, this provision will even block State efforts to ensure that farmers know whether or not they are planting GE seeds. Farmers selling to the rapidly growing organic and non-GE markets are prohibited from using GE seeds.

5) The bill includes a provision that is potentially disastrous for the organic sector, by requiring USDA to consider harmonizing the new ambiguous “bioengineered” definitions in the bill with USDA’s long-standing organic standards and definitions governing the prohibition on use of genetic engineering.

Unless clarified, this ambiguous language in the bill could unravel the current role of the USDA organic label as the gold standard for consumers seeking to buy non-GE foods. Organic standards go far beyond the GE prohibitions, but for many organic consumers, this is one of the central attributes of the organic label.

The organic sector continues to be one of the fastest growing sectors of the U.S. agricultural economy, and this bill threatens to undermine consumer confidence in the organic label.

For these reasons and many more, we are urging you to veto this dangerous and unacceptable legislation.


Beyond Pesticides
Carolina Farm Stewardship Association Cedar Circle Farm and Education Center Center for Food Safety
Citizens for GMO Labeling
Cornucopia Institute
Dr. Bronner’s
Equal Exchange
Family Farm Defenders
Food Democracy Now
Food & Water Watch
Friends of the Earth
Genesis Farm
GMO Action Alliance
GMO Insider
Green America
Grow More, Waste Less
Illinois Stewardship Alliance
Institute for Responsible Technology
Kanalani Ohana Farm
Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association
Midwest Organic Dairy Producers Alliance
Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Service
Montana Organic Association
National Organic Coalition
Nature’s Path Foods
Non-GMO Project
Northeast Organic Dairy Producers Alliance
Northeast Organic Farming Association- Connecticut
Northeast Organic Farming Association- Interstate Council
Northeast Organic Farming Association- Massachusetts
Northeast Organic Farming Association- New Hampshire
Northeast Organic Farming Association- New York
Northeast Organic Farming Association- Rhode Island
Northeast Organic Farming Association- Vermont
Ohio Ecological Food and Farm Association
Organic Consumers Association
Organic Farmers’ Agency for Relationship Management (OFARM)
Organically Grown Company
Oregon Right to Know
Organic Seed Alliance
Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association
PCC Natural Markets, Washington State
Pesticide Action Network
Regeneration Vermont
Rural Advancement Foundation International- USA
Rural Vermont
Straus Family Creamery
Sustainable Warwick
The Organic and Non-GMO Report
Vermont Public Action Research Group
Vermont Right to Know Coalition
Yellow Barn Biodynamic

Related reading

Food crops shouldn't produce experimental drugs

To Washington state Senate Rules Committee and Senate Ways and Means Committee, urging an amendment to SHB 2640 to prohibit tax incentives for "pharma" crops engineered to produce experimental drugs and chemicals from food crops.

GE foods are "materially" different

A sign-on letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg about labeling GE foods

FDA proposes guidelines to regulate GE animals

Comments submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration during public comment period on regulation of genetically modified animals.